🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," said a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization founded by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to design products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this international conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and others indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.